Showing posts with label REITs. Show all posts
Showing posts with label REITs. Show all posts

Tuesday, 9 July 2024

MIT vs MLT. Which To Choose?

As mentioned in an earlier post in June, I have more funds to add to my portfolio this month.
 
Coupled with my aim this year to veer my portfolio to be less Reits-concentrated, I did two rounds of stock screening to uncover suitable counters for further study.

The screening did shown some promising counters on first glance. However I eventually decided against adding into these due to various reasons such as low trading liquidity, outlook of business, unsustainable / irregular dividend payment or the business nature simply doesn't align with my values (as is the case for one of the counters).
 
Long story short, I went back to look at my existing holdings and decided to take this opportunity to average down on couple of them.
 
I would have added into Ascendas Reit if it is not the top position in my portfolio now.
 
So I looked into Mapletree Logistics Trust and Mapletree Industrial Trust.

All three mentioned are among the fastest to recover during an upturn.

Anyway I did a quick study on the annual reports of MLT and MIT to guide my decision.
 
Sharing below summary for readers and fellow investors.
 
Notes: Data gathered from respective FY23/24 annual report. Both MIT and MLT did EFR in this period.
 

Sentiments from the findings

1) Both are well managed in terms of maintaining their portfolio occupancy, achieving positive rental revisions, increasing their distributable income and managing their debt profiles --> increasing income and well-managed debt are two of the most important attributes for any business aren't they?
 
2) However they are affected by certain macro factors e.g. in the case of MLT, China's oversupply of warehouse spaces.
 
3) Interest rates and Forex effect are and will always be something to look out for. In my opinion the management of these metrics is what set the good Reits apart from the mediocre ones.
 
4) Especially in times like now, points 2 and 3 above form the basis of analysis for Reits investment.

5) Buy into MIT if you believe in the future of DCs and don't mind the concentration risk in geography.

6) Buy into MLT if you believe in the importance of logistics and don't mind the potential slight drop in DPU yield while waiting for the chinese assets to recover.

My personal mantra has always been technology develops the world (DC) and logistics moves the world (globalisation and commerce). In this century there's simply no avoiding either.

Hence I did the best thing I can in this situation. I added to my holdings for both counters in around equal quantum - MIT @ $2.10 and MLT @ $1.26.

Quick tip: If you do not have time or do not want to go through the entire annual report, it would be useful to at least read through the Chairman and CEO message to unitholders.

Friday, 30 April 2021

April 2021 Updates

Apr 2021
 
Portfolio Value after market close

S$147,010.00

Purchase

None

Sold

None

Dividends
 
None

Short-Term Transactions

GME PUT (closed), PLTR PUT (sold)

Summary

01 Apr 2021 STI Open: 3,181.68
30 Apr 2021 STI Close: 3,218.27
 
STI continues to close above its monthly opening for the fourth consecutive month since the start of this year.
 
 
This month's is probably due to the good results from DBS which in turn lifted the share price of the other two local banks as well.
 
I would place closer attention to next month on the market's reaction to the rising cases of local Covid-19 infections.
 
For my SGD portfolio, value increased by 2.25% though I did nothing to it this month. 

This is also largely driven by the rise in share price of the bank counters and partly offset by the fall in Reits.

Current spare cash level is about $10K, which I hope there are opportunities for me to plough into this SGD portfolio in the coming month. 

For my Syfe Core Growth portfolio, I am seeing a small positive return so far though it would be more meaningful to see the returns in the long run.
 
Have DCAed into this portfolio yesterday and plans to continue this strategy every month end.

For my USD portfolio, I have not done any intraday trading this month.
 
However I have closed the GME PUT that I wrote previously as an experimental first try. 

It is a good experiment with a small gross profit of 5.6% for a holding of about one month. I think what's important is the knowledge gained in this practical trading.
 
Apart from this, I have sold another PUT this month for PLTR, expiring 21/5/2021 with a strike price of $21 and premium of $1.01.
 
I think at this price point there is a sweet balance between risk and reward.
 
I have touched abit on this previously.

Moving forward I will continue to use options as part of my investment / trading tools to augment my investable income. 

And no, I have not touched cryptos yet though that was one of my investment aims set earlier this year.

It's tempting to read the enormous gains posted by others in online forums but I prefer to do more due diligence before going into that.

Will definitely update if I forayed into this area next time.

Friday, 28 June 2019

June 2019 Update

June 2019

Portfolio Value after market close: S$100,533.67

Wifey's Portfolio Value after market close: S$48, 506.66

Purchases: None

Sold: None

Dividends:

ESR Reit: Scrip
MLT: Scrip
OCBC: $5.29

Our portfolios reached a new high despite taking profit on some counters previously. This is due to the run up of the Reits in our portfolio.

It has been awhile since my portfolio value touched $100k.

Still on the lookout for suitable counters to add. But for now most seem overpriced.

Overall was a busy and stressful month for me in terms of work. I can foresee it will be equally if not more hectic at least for the next two months.

This year also marked the first year that my company has to pay corporate tax.

It came as a little surprise as I thought new startups enjoy a 3 years tax exemption. However upon checking I realised the regulation has changed.

It is bittersweet for me. Looking on the bright side having to pay tax means at least my business is making money.

I also overspent by quite a bit this month as baby M turned one!

Had a simple dinner celebration with family members in a restaurant that costs a grand+ and ordered a baby-friendly cake that costs $130.

Also celebrated our wedding anniversary at a mexican restaurant with just wifey and I.

Though overspent, I considered these well-spent. Memories made are priceless. 

Tuesday, 30 April 2019

April 2019 Portfolio Update

April 2019

Portfolio Value after market close: S$90,017.44

Wifey's Portfolio Value after market close: S$45,681.02
 
Purchases: None

Sold: 5,000 shares of CapitaLand

Comment:

CapitaLand

Balanced 4,000 shares of CapitaLand at $2.98. Will continue to keep for its ~4% dividend while waiting for its breakthrough.

Cash has been growing with my recent sale of M1 and CapitaLand. Intend to put it back into the market but most of the reits and income stocks in my watch list are overpriced at the moment.

Not going to buy for the sake of buying. Will continue to monitor the market for entry opportunities. Meanwhile the cash will stay in my OCBC 360 account for the 2% interest.

RHT Health Trust

RHT Health Trust is making some interesting movements in the past couple of months with the name change and appointment of a new chairman and directors, some of whom came with healthcare management background.

I don't think these are done for fun. I'm looking forward to the possible good news ahead. Hopefully the new CEO will inject some attractive new assets for the shareholders.

Will continue to hold onto my shares.

Japfa

Japfa still seems to be affected by the swine flu news though fundamentally nothing has changed. Will be monitoring the share price with a view to add more.

Saturday, 30 March 2019

Mar 2019 Portfolio Update

March 2019

Portfolio Value after market close: S$106,881.07
Wifey's Portfolio Value after market close: S$44,333.53

Comment:

1) Realised a 4.94% gain on M1 after accepting Konnectivity's offer. Not bad for a 3 years holding considering the prior circumstances.

2) Contemplating whether to take profit on my reits especially for CCT which is at 40+% gain now.

Monday, 16 April 2018

Takeaways from Suntec REIT AGM 2018

Suntec REIT AGM 2018

Date: 16/04/2018

Duration: 2.05 - 3.10 pm

Turnout: About 90% (At least half are whom I can call aunties and uncles despite me being an uncle myself. This is a testament to Suntec's popularity as a stable REIT among this group of investors.)

AGM started with a 20 min presentation of the REIT's results in 2017 and recent progress by Mr Chan Kong Leong, CEO and Executive Director.

Questions from the floor

Q: Regarding its overseas expansion, have Suntec consider the tax implications involved such as capital gain tax and withholding tax?

A: Suntec receive advice from experts and structure their business for the most tax efficiency. However certain taxes due to regulations, are unavoidable.

Q: The same unit holder also suggested using big data and artificial intelligence for future property acquisitions to stay ahead of the curve.

A: Suntec is currently using big data for business enhancements but not A.I. at the moment.

Q:What is the board's stance on improving tenant retention ratio to 80 - 90% as compared to the current 64%?

A: Suntec do not want that high of a ratio because they and the shoppers want something new and fresh regularly.

Suntec is guided by what they and the market wants at the end of the day.

Q: How much capital distribution is left and how will future distribution payout be affected once the capital distribution is exhausted?

A: More than $100 M is left for distribution. When this is exhausted, income from the new properties such as 9 Penang Road will comes in.

Q: Suntec's rental or occupancy (I didn't catch this properly. Apologies.) is lower than that of heartland malls. How is Suntec handling that?

A: Suntec is trying to improve the fundamentals. When the fundamentals are improved, rentals will come back. This can already be seen in the latest results.

Q: Why is Suntec not investing in China?

A: Suntec is choosing to invest in Australia because of the political stability, good returns, good quality of properties, etc.

Resolutions: All passed.

Observations

The last question in above Q&A was answered by the Chairwoman, Ms Chew Gek Khim. She only replied with the above one liner and when the questioner probed further, she just said a thank you and wanted to proceed to the next agenda.

I thought that was pretty rude and came across as insincere and impatient.

Sentiments from the floor seem to concur as the resolution to endorse the appointment of Ms Chew Gek Khim (Resolution 3) only garnered 50+% approval. In other words 40 over % voted against her.

This is the lowest I've seen in the AGMs that I've attended.

On the other hand, CEO Mr Chan answered well to the questions from the floor and he came across as being candid. I thought he did quite well.

Summary and my thoughts

In my opinion Suntec REIT remains an attractive REIT trading below its NAV.

Having office, retail and MICE elements in its portfolio, it is a good proxy to these 3 sectors for an investor wanting to invest in all three instead of either one.

Forward distribution yield should remain comfortably above 5%. Although this is not the best among REITs, I like the stability this REIT offers with its high quality assets in the CBD.

Distribution yield against my cost remains above 6%.

Another assuring factor for me is the quality of the REIT manager. I have happy memories with ARA previously when they were still listed.

Among the overseas properties, 177 Pacific Highway has a 100% committed occupancy with no lease expiring until 2023 onwards.

Most importantly there is earnings visibility coming in from the new properties namely 9 Penang Road and Olderfleet. Contributions from these two properties should be meaningful from 2020 onwards.

Tuesday, 14 November 2017

City Developments vs CapitaLand

The recent release of CapitaLand's latest financial results sent the share price downwards despite it being a decent set of results.

As I was thinking about this, it led me to the next questions.

Why is it that City Developments can be trading in the region of S$12+ while CapitaLand continues to languish at S$3+ and what are the differences between the two companies?

It piqued my interest as I have never delved into City Developments before and I set to find out more.

The comparisons gave me a big surprise.


 Overview of City Developments (CDL)

City Developments Limited has a history of more than 50 years since their beginning in a small rented office in Amber Mansions on 7th September 1963.

They have since evolved into a Singapore-listed international real estate operating company with presence in 26 countries including Singapore, Australia, China, Japan, UK and rest of Europe.

CDL's portfolio consists of residences, offices, hotels, serviced apartments, integrated developments and shopping malls.

One of their most recognised brands is the Millennium & Copthorne hotels chain.

CDL's core markets are UK, US, China, Japan and China.


Overview of CapitaLand (CPL)

CapitaLand group is a property company created from the merger of Pidemco Land and DBS Land in November 2000.

Since then CPL has grown to become one of Asia's largest real estate companies. Based and listed in Singapore, it is an owner and manager of a S$85 billion portfolio comprising integrated developments, shopping malls, serviced residences, offices, homes, REITs and funds in over 30 countries.

It is also one of the largest investment management businesses in Asia with 14 real estate private equity funds and 5 REITs worth over S$47 billion in assets under management.

CapitaLand acquired Raffles Holdings and The Ascott Group in 2006 and 2008 respectively and the latter is the world's largest international serviced residence owner-operator.

Singapore and China remain the two core markets of CPL, totalling 82% of the group's total assets.

Comparison of the Financial Figures


As mentioned earlier I have never studied CDL before. But inferring from the share price I expect the scale of their business to be much bigger than CapitaLand.

However this is exactly the opposite.

No matter which metric you look at - cash holding, revenue, PATMI, assets or AUM, CapitaLand is clearly the bigger player.

Exception is the EPS where CDL is slightly higher than CPL.

Note: Figures are from the 3Q17 financial reports of both companies.

Valuation

I then did some quick calculations for the latest P/E and P/B ratios as a gauge of their valuation.

Again CPL is the winner here. In fact CPL is currently trading under book value whereas CDL is trading slightly above book.

Future Growth of City Developments

In 2016 CDL acquired 20% stake in mamahome - China's fast-growing online apartment rental platform.

In 2017 CDL acquired 24% stake in Distrii - China's leading operator of co-working space.

These synergistic acquisitions are a move away from their traditional sources of income and it's nice to see this forward-looking direction of the management.

In the near term, CDL has several upcoming local residential projects including New Futura, a Tampines Ave 10 project and South Beach Residences.

Upcoming overseas residential projects include 1 in China, 7 in UK and 1 in Japan.

CDL also embarked on 2 projects in Australia for luxury retirement village development with expected completion in 2020 and 2021.

CDL is also actively engaging in asset enhancement initiatives for various Millennium & Copthorne hotels in New Zealand, UK, KL and Singapore.

Future Growth of CapitaLand

CapitaLand has over 8,000 residential units with a value of RMB 13.8 billion sold in China and expected to be handed over from 4Q17 onwards. 10% of the value is expected to be recognised in 4Q17 and 70% in 2018.

On the shopping mall front, CPL opened their largest mall - Suzhou Centre Mall three days ago on 11th Nov 2017.

CPL is also set to continue their expansion in markets such as Vietnam and Indonesia. Their residential project in Vietnam - d'Edge is close to 100% sold.

SingPost Centre opened on 12th Oct 2017, is CPL's first managed mall in Singapore under management contract.

Apart from the above, CPL has 6 management contracts in China to date as well.

CPL also launched CapitaLand online mall on Lazada on 16th Oct 2017.

It's good to see these new initiatives from CPL which show that the management is actively looking for new income sources.

On the serviced residences front, Ascott is on track to achieve their target of 80,000 units under management by 2020.

Summary and Conclusion

Beside the fact that both are real estate companies, City Developments and CapitaLand are also similar in terms of assets composition, development type and geographical composition.

In terms of business scale, CapitaLand is much bigger with significantly higher top and bottom lines compared to City Developments.

However in terms of share price, City Developments is the clear winner. Since January this year, share price of CDL has rose 50% while share price of CPL has increased by 18%.

Shareholders make money either through dividends and / or capital appreciation.

Since both CDL and CPL are not fantastic dividend counters I will look at capital appreciation instead.

For capital to appreciate, the share price must appreciate. Simple.

Based on the basic valuation metrics, CapitaLand share price has much room for appreciation.

However since the share price has dropped after the release of 3Q17 results, is it because shareholders feel that the results are not comparable to the previous year?

Comparing Y-o-Y revenue, latest 3Q indeed fell by 0.1%.

However Y-o-Y, profit increased by ~70%, EPS increased from $0.179 to $0.302 and ROE increased to 4.97% from a negative figure.

This is what perplexes me. The company is earning more and generating more returns on the shareholders' investment but the market feels otherwise.

Can anyone enlighten me please?

Friday, 3 November 2017

Viva Industrial Trust - My First Foray Into Industrial REITs

Today (actually it's yesterday since it has passed midnight) marks my first foray into the industrial class of REITs if I don't consider Mapletree Logistics Trust as industrial.




Viva Industrial Trust is not a pure industrial REIT. It has a hotel among its properties.

I have been monitoring Viva Industrial Trust for some time. When the price dropped more than the dividend post-XD today, I decided to take advantage of this and buy into this counter @ $0.955.

Ideally I would like to go in below $0.95 but guess I am not that disciplined.

Results from Viva's latest quarter look promising.


Comparing Y-o-Y and Q-o-Q,


Other results,

Gearing is reasonable at <40%.

WALE is 2.8 years. To be honest I would prefer this to be higher.

And portfolio occupancy is 90.9%.

As a matter of fact, the above figures allude to the good fundamentals and good management of the trust.

Furthermore with the opening of the Downtown line station connecting directly to UE BizHub East, there is a real possibility of upcoming positive rental reversion and increment of the property value.

However the deal clincher for me is the AEI done for their Viva Business Park (VBP) in Chai Chee. I've been to VBP several times in the past for business meetings before they commenced the AEI.

Post-AEI, I've went back several times with my wife and what a world of difference the initiatives made!

The most obvious improvement is the number of retailers and anchor tenants such as Harvey Norman and Decathlon taking up space in the business park.

This is a far cry from the old VBP where majority of the tenants are commercial entities and the only retail shops on the ground floor are cafes and such.

The effort made for the AEI is actually visually-obvious. It changes the whole vibe of the business park. And I have to say I am impressed by what I see.

Paying at $0.955 a piece for Viva means paying a premium to its NAV and this is usually what I don't do.

However I see limited downside and much upside to the price due to the increased buying interest in this REIT, value-realisation of UE BizHub East and potential of increased income from VBP.

The way I see it, Viva will break $1.00 soon.

My plan when I placed the queue order today was this:

a) If the price appreciated within these few days, I might do a short term trade.

b) If the price drops, I will hold as part of my income portfolio. A dividend yield of nearly 8% doesn't hurt.

Cheers.