Got some time today so used AI to review my portfolio without bias.
The results are quite satisfactory but contain some inaccuracies. This again emphasised the need to fact check everything from AI and not accept blindly.
And just nice I was looking at Netlink earlier before this review😁. Was deciding between Netlink and Sembcorp, and this review might have just made the decision easier.
This is the prompt I used:
What do you think about this portfolio and how would you improve it from an income point of view while balancing growth and stability?
This is my portfolio screenshot:
This is from ChatGPT (wordings in blue are my comments):
This is actually a fairly solid Singapore income portfolio already. You’ve built around:
-
Singapore banks (DBS, OCBC)
-
Singapore telco/utilities-style cashflow (Singtel, NetLink)
-
Multiple S-REITs
-
Some industrial/logistics exposure
-
A bit of cyclical growth (Venture)
From an income + stability perspective, it’s much stronger than a lot of retail portfolios that are overly speculative.
That said, there are a few concentration and structural issues I would improve.
What I Like About This Portfolio
1. Strong dividend backbone
Your portfolio is clearly designed around:
-
recurring cashflow
-
dividend compounding
-
blue-chip Singapore exposure
That’s good for:
-
long-term wealth preservation
-
future retirement income
-
lower volatility vs growth stocks
The DBS + OCBC positions especially are carrying the portfolio very well.
2. You own high-quality Singapore assets
Some strong names here:
-
DBS
-
OCBC
-
Singtel
-
NetLink NBN Trust
-
CapitaLand Integrated Commercial Trust
-
Mapletree Logistics Trust
These are generally institutional-grade Singapore income names.
Main Weaknesses
1. Overexposure to S-REITs
You have many REITs:
-
CapLand Ascendas REIT
-
Capitaland Investment
(Technically not a REIT. Bought this to diversify away from REITs previously.)
-
Centurion? (if 8C8U is CICT/CENT)
(Is Centurion Accom REIT)
-
Mapletree Industrial
-
Mapletree Logistics
-
UOB REIT? (Is UIB REIT. ChatGPT doesn't recognise?)
-
etc.
This creates hidden concentration risk because many REITs react similarly to:
-
interest rates
-
refinancing costs
-
office/industrial property cycles
-
Singapore/China commercial demand
Right now several of your REITs are underwater because:
-
higher-for-longer interest rates compressed valuations
-
financing costs rose
-
yield spreads narrowed (Mapletree!)
You’re diversified by ticker, but not necessarily by economic driver. (Fair point)
2. Banks are carrying the portfolio
Your unrealized gains are largely: (My CICT and Venture also not bad leh)
Without them, the overall portfolio performance would look much weaker.
That tells me:
-
your strongest businesses are concentrated in a few holdings
-
some REIT allocations may be too large relative to quality (Good point. Will review.)
3. Missing global growth exposure
The portfolio is very Singapore-centric. (I have another portfolio for US and HK stocks)
That gives:
But limits:
-
innovation exposure
-
global earnings growth
-
AI/tech/productivity trends
-
US market leadership
Singapore is excellent for income. (My thoughts exactly. Aim has always been to build a solid base here while seeking growth from US and other markets.)
It is not excellent for long-term capital growth alone.
My Suggested Portfolio Structure
For a balanced income + growth + stability portfolio:
| Category | Target |
|---|
| Singapore Banks | 25–30%
|
| High-quality REITs | 20–25% |
| Singapore Infrastructure/Defensive | 15–20% |
| Global Equity ETFs | 20–30% |
| Cash/T-bills | 5–10% |
What I Would Personally Adjust
Reduce weaker REIT overlap
You don’t necessarily need:
-
multiple industrial REITs
-
multiple logistics REITs
-
multiple similar property exposures
I’d consolidate into fewer, stronger REITs.
For example:
Keep:
-
Ascendas REIT
-
Mapletree Industrial (Above mentioned Mapletree Logistics Trust is high quality asset. Now say keep Mapletree Industrial instead?)
-
maybe one retail/commercial REIT
Reduce:
-
overlapping logistics/office exposure
Quality matters more than quantity.
Add Global ETFs
This is the biggest improvement I’d make.
Consider slowly building:
These add:
-
US tech
-
healthcare
-
global consumer brands
-
AI growth
-
long-term capital appreciation
This balances the slower-growth nature of SGX income investing.
Income Optimization Ideas
1. Focus on dividend growth, not just yield (Good reminder)
A dangerous trap in SG investing is chasing:
-
7–9% yields
-
weaker REITs
-
leveraged trusts
Instead:
-
prioritize sustainability
-
balance sheet strength
-
dividend growth potential
DBS is a great example:
lower yield historically than risky REITs, but far stronger total return.
2. Build a dividend “core”
Your strongest core holdings are probably:
-
DBS
-
OCBC
-
Singtel
-
NetLink
-
Ascendas REIT
These can form the stable income engine.
3. Add some dry powder
You are heavily invested already.
Keeping:
-
5–10% in T-bills or cash
lets you:
-
buy during crashes
-
reduce emotional investing
-
improve long-term returns
Especially useful if REITs fall further.
One Important Observation
Your portfolio currently looks optimized for:
-
dividend income
-
moderate stability
But not fully optimized for:
-
inflation-beating growth over 15–20 years.
Singapore equities alone may underperform global equities long term.
A hybrid strategy tends to work better:
-
SGX for income
-
global ETFs for growth
That combination is very powerful.
If This Were My Portfolio
I’d probably aim for something like:
| Asset Type | Approx % |
|---|
| DBS + OCBC | 30% |
| SG REITs | 20% |
| Singtel + NetLink | 15% |
| Global ETFs | 25% |
| Cash/T-bills | 10% |
That would likely produce:
-
good dividend income
-
lower volatility
-
better global diversification
-
stronger long-term compounding
while still maintaining the Singapore income profile you clearly value.
