Showing posts with label Revenue. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Revenue. Show all posts

Wednesday, 14 November 2018

Review of CapitaLand 3Q18 Results


CapitaLand has just released its 3Q18 results this morning.

All in all it is a good set of numbers as expected.

PATMI increased by 13.6% to $362.2 M.

Due to higher operating PATMI and assets recycling.

Operating PATMI increased by 13.3% to $233.7 M.

Due to contributions from newly acquired and opened investment properties.

EBIT increased 0.2% to $796.3 M.

Due to recurring income from investment properties and contributions from development projects, fair value uplift and portfolio gains from divestments.

Topline for the quarter fell 16.9% to $1.26 B.

Due to lower contributions from development projects in China and Singapore, partially mitigated by higher rental revenue from newly acquired and opened properties as well as consolidation of revenue from three entities.

$4.0 B of assets are divested YTD and recycled into $6.1 B of new investments including higher yielding assets that are immediately incoming producing.

Gearing stands at 0.51x (2018 YTD)


Notable Points

1) RMB6.36 B and more than S$71.2 M of sales will be recognised in 4Q18 from China and Vietnam markets.

2) CapitaLand / GIC JV's acquisition of Shanghai's tallest twin towers along the north bund. This iconic landmark will be CapitaLand's 3rd Raffles City in Shanghai and 10th globally.

Property construction is expected to be completed by next June.

3) There is 44% drop in portfolio gains comparing YoY. I need to spend some time to further understand this. Nonetheless is still a gain not a loss.


Thoughts

No matter how I look this is a decent set of results from CapitaLand. However it does not seems to provide the catalyst for the uplift of its share price. Same as with previous cases.

In fact CapitaLand was among the top institutional selling last week.

Perhaps the big boys deemed this to be not good enough. Or perhaps there is a deliberate attempt to push down the share price.

My feel is that CapitaLand is always on the radar of the institutional players and therefore will always be subject to the effects of the big boys trade.

With a slew of developments in the pipeline (e.g. new acquisitions, malls management, coliving, coworking, dormitories, etc) the outlook for CapitaLand is exciting to look forward to.

At this point of writing, CapitaLand is trading at an attractive level. Will continue to add.

Thursday, 1 February 2018

Portfolio Review: Viva Industrial Trust

Managed to find time to review the performance of my holdings.

For Viva Industrial Trust (VIT), the FY2017 results are nothing short of stunning and vindicated my decision to pay a premium to purchase the units three months ago.

The glowing result is mainly contributed by the post-AEI Viva Business Park and the logistics property at 6 Chin Bee Avenue. UE BizHub East also shows marginal increase in revenue contribution.

The following slides show it all.



In a span of one year (2016 end - 2017 end), share price of VIT ran up from S$0.755 to S$0.94. An increase of nearly 20 cents. This is justifiable.

As an income investor, one of the criteria I look out for when adding a stock into my long term portfolio is the dividend payout. In this aspect VIT remains one of the best among the industrial REITs.

I do have a concern regarding the WALE of 2.6 years though I won't be losing sleep over this as VIT is doing quite well in terms of tenancy retention. However this shall be a point of monitoring for me.

Fundamentally, VIT remains solid. Outlook in my opinion, is looking good especially for both business parks.

Will I continue to keep VIT in my portfolio? Absolutely.

Will I add more? Yes.

Now comes the golden question. How do I see the possible merger of ESR and VIT?

I will answer this in the next post since the reply will not be a short one.

Tuesday, 14 November 2017

City Developments vs CapitaLand

The recent release of CapitaLand's latest financial results sent the share price downwards despite it being a decent set of results.

As I was thinking about this, it led me to the next questions.

Why is it that City Developments can be trading in the region of S$12+ while CapitaLand continues to languish at S$3+ and what are the differences between the two companies?

It piqued my interest as I have never delved into City Developments before and I set to find out more.

The comparisons gave me a big surprise.


 Overview of City Developments (CDL)

City Developments Limited has a history of more than 50 years since their beginning in a small rented office in Amber Mansions on 7th September 1963.

They have since evolved into a Singapore-listed international real estate operating company with presence in 26 countries including Singapore, Australia, China, Japan, UK and rest of Europe.

CDL's portfolio consists of residences, offices, hotels, serviced apartments, integrated developments and shopping malls.

One of their most recognised brands is the Millennium & Copthorne hotels chain.

CDL's core markets are UK, US, China, Japan and China.


Overview of CapitaLand (CPL)

CapitaLand group is a property company created from the merger of Pidemco Land and DBS Land in November 2000.

Since then CPL has grown to become one of Asia's largest real estate companies. Based and listed in Singapore, it is an owner and manager of a S$85 billion portfolio comprising integrated developments, shopping malls, serviced residences, offices, homes, REITs and funds in over 30 countries.

It is also one of the largest investment management businesses in Asia with 14 real estate private equity funds and 5 REITs worth over S$47 billion in assets under management.

CapitaLand acquired Raffles Holdings and The Ascott Group in 2006 and 2008 respectively and the latter is the world's largest international serviced residence owner-operator.

Singapore and China remain the two core markets of CPL, totalling 82% of the group's total assets.

Comparison of the Financial Figures


As mentioned earlier I have never studied CDL before. But inferring from the share price I expect the scale of their business to be much bigger than CapitaLand.

However this is exactly the opposite.

No matter which metric you look at - cash holding, revenue, PATMI, assets or AUM, CapitaLand is clearly the bigger player.

Exception is the EPS where CDL is slightly higher than CPL.

Note: Figures are from the 3Q17 financial reports of both companies.

Valuation

I then did some quick calculations for the latest P/E and P/B ratios as a gauge of their valuation.

Again CPL is the winner here. In fact CPL is currently trading under book value whereas CDL is trading slightly above book.

Future Growth of City Developments

In 2016 CDL acquired 20% stake in mamahome - China's fast-growing online apartment rental platform.

In 2017 CDL acquired 24% stake in Distrii - China's leading operator of co-working space.

These synergistic acquisitions are a move away from their traditional sources of income and it's nice to see this forward-looking direction of the management.

In the near term, CDL has several upcoming local residential projects including New Futura, a Tampines Ave 10 project and South Beach Residences.

Upcoming overseas residential projects include 1 in China, 7 in UK and 1 in Japan.

CDL also embarked on 2 projects in Australia for luxury retirement village development with expected completion in 2020 and 2021.

CDL is also actively engaging in asset enhancement initiatives for various Millennium & Copthorne hotels in New Zealand, UK, KL and Singapore.

Future Growth of CapitaLand

CapitaLand has over 8,000 residential units with a value of RMB 13.8 billion sold in China and expected to be handed over from 4Q17 onwards. 10% of the value is expected to be recognised in 4Q17 and 70% in 2018.

On the shopping mall front, CPL opened their largest mall - Suzhou Centre Mall three days ago on 11th Nov 2017.

CPL is also set to continue their expansion in markets such as Vietnam and Indonesia. Their residential project in Vietnam - d'Edge is close to 100% sold.

SingPost Centre opened on 12th Oct 2017, is CPL's first managed mall in Singapore under management contract.

Apart from the above, CPL has 6 management contracts in China to date as well.

CPL also launched CapitaLand online mall on Lazada on 16th Oct 2017.

It's good to see these new initiatives from CPL which show that the management is actively looking for new income sources.

On the serviced residences front, Ascott is on track to achieve their target of 80,000 units under management by 2020.

Summary and Conclusion

Beside the fact that both are real estate companies, City Developments and CapitaLand are also similar in terms of assets composition, development type and geographical composition.

In terms of business scale, CapitaLand is much bigger with significantly higher top and bottom lines compared to City Developments.

However in terms of share price, City Developments is the clear winner. Since January this year, share price of CDL has rose 50% while share price of CPL has increased by 18%.

Shareholders make money either through dividends and / or capital appreciation.

Since both CDL and CPL are not fantastic dividend counters I will look at capital appreciation instead.

For capital to appreciate, the share price must appreciate. Simple.

Based on the basic valuation metrics, CapitaLand share price has much room for appreciation.

However since the share price has dropped after the release of 3Q17 results, is it because shareholders feel that the results are not comparable to the previous year?

Comparing Y-o-Y revenue, latest 3Q indeed fell by 0.1%.

However Y-o-Y, profit increased by ~70%, EPS increased from $0.179 to $0.302 and ROE increased to 4.97% from a negative figure.

This is what perplexes me. The company is earning more and generating more returns on the shareholders' investment but the market feels otherwise.

Can anyone enlighten me please?